Product direction · workflow research · enterprise scale Research across the whole picture

The problem is rarely
where it first appears.

The practiceI trace consequential product questions across people, interfaces, operations, and evidence—then turn the whole picture into direction teams can act on.

Find the questionTrace the systemConnect the evidenceShape direction
Selected work

Selected cases where research had to clarify the problem before it could shape the product.

Public-safe reconstructions preserve the research logic while changing names, details, values, and visual language.

Strategic researchcross-product synthesis
Value evidence / diagnosticReconstructed
Evidence confidenceWhere the story breaks
Needs attention
BaselinePartial
InstrumentationMixed
AttributionWeak
Hidden prerequisitesOwnership · readiness · measurement3 linked interventions

When success could not prove itself.

A multi-month investigation traced the problem across customer practice, product capabilities, analytics, implementation, and organizational ownership.

Signal detectionCross-product synthesisDecision framework
Participatory researchevidence architecture
Customer evidence / decision viewSynthetic data
Priority vs. measurability Priority Confidence
Question → pattern → decision

Designing customer research at scale.

Interconnected activities captured measurement priorities, adoption barriers, AI readiness, capability use, and the organizational conditions behind each signal.

Participatory researchEvidence architectureInteractive dashboard
AI product researchenterprise fieldwork
Conversation / handoff workspaceConcept reconstruction
Live request · authenticated

“I need help with a leave question.”

I can help clarify that. Before we continue…

Designing the handoff between AI and people.

The work moved beyond demo appeal to the operating conditions required for a voice assistant to resolve, transfer, recover, and remain accountable.

Enterprise fieldworkWorkflow requirementsTrust & governance
The throughlineResearch + facilitation

The most consequential product problems rarely live inside one screen.

They live in the relationship between what people need, what a product allows, what operations can sustain, and what an organization can recognize as value. That is the field I research.

Evidence system01

Evidence systems

How research becomes comparable, traceable, reusable, and useful after the original readout.

Participatory research · Executive workshops · Research enablement
Product consequence02

Product direction & value

How products earn adoption, demonstrate value, and become easier to defend, prioritize, or expand.

Product direction · Measurement · Adoption · Customer strategy
PPL UI OPS EVD
The connective practiceCurrent view · 05
The relationship is the unit of analysis.

People, interfaces, operations, evidence, and organizational value become legible together.

Research outcomeShared direction →
Operational reality03

Work & access

How devices, time, place, privacy, managers, and interruptions shape what a product can ask of people.

Deskless work · Manager experience · Connected work
Human system04

AI & human systems

Where automation should act, where people need authority, and what trust requires across the handoff.

AI assistants · Voice · Agentic workflows · Governance
Service structure05

Information & service architecture

How language, taxonomy, knowledge, content, and fulfillment shape the path through a complex service.

Information architecture · Taxonomy · Knowledge · Onboarding
Working principles

Frame. Connect. Activate.

Three moves help complex research stay centered on a decision rather than becoming a catalogue of findings.

01 · Frame

Find the decision.

Separate the visible request from the uncertainty that is actually preventing movement.

02 · Connect

Build the whole picture.

Connect customer behavior, product constraints, operational reality, and business context.

03 · Activate

Change the work.

Shape the evidence into priorities, requirements, and artifacts that make the next choice easier.

ObjectsInterfacesOrganizations
About

From objects, to interfaces, to organizations.

My path through industrial design, interaction design, design strategy, and research shaped a practice that moves easily between details and systems.

Based in San Francisco. Usually making, photographing, or learning something outside the portfolio. More about me

Let’s compare notes.

I am interested in research and strategy roles where complex evidence needs to become clear product direction—inside enterprise software, growing products, or something adjacent.